Assange judge is 40-year ‘good friend’ of minister who orchestrated...<\/h2><\/a>\n READ MORE <\/i><\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\u2018We should be ready\u2019<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\nThe hosting of a media freedom event within miles of Belmarsh prison in southeast London was seen as a public relations problem. Internal Foreign Office emails show UK officials monitored online behaviour accordingly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
After Hunt announced<\/a> plans for the conference in February 2019, one official complained about \u201ca few individual crazy responses to the FS\u2019 [Foreign Secretary\u2019s] tweet\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\nBy June, officials were requesting \u201cLines to Take on how best to respond to questions we expect to be raised on this occasion about the UK handling of the case of Julian Assange\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In particular, \u201cIcelandic criticism of UK handling of [the] Assange case\u201d was seen to be \u201caffecting messaging on media freedom\u201d. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
This email was likely related to former Icelandic Interior Minister \u00d6gmundur <\/em>J\u00f3nasson, who had asserted<\/a> in June that the Assange case put \u201cthe British justice system\u2026on trial\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\u201cOur current approach is right and we shouldn\u2019t engage”.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
On 8 July, two days before the conference began, an unnamed official wrote about \u201ca ramp up in activity by Assange campaigners\u201d. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
One cause for concern was Assange\u2019s mother Christine, who had \u201cjoined calls for a tweetstorm during the conference\u201d, as well as \u201caccounts [which] are small scale or are run by active trolls and provocateurs\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The official outlined rules for engagement, noting \u201cour current approach is right and we shouldn\u2019t engage\u2026However, we should be ready. I\u2019m keen that we agree ahead of time how and when our approach would evolve\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In an email with the subject line \u201cMedia Freedom Conference \u2013 online register of interest form\u201d, one official even questioned: \u201cwhat if someone like Assange applied to attend?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Foreign Office emails discussing Assange remain heavily redacted for reasons of \u201cnational security\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n
\n RELATED<\/h3>\n \n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n UK\u2019s former Brexit secretary says Assange judge \u2018got the law...<\/h2><\/a>\n READ MORE <\/i><\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\u2018No communications strategy can make this go away\u2019<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\nAccording to a recent academic study<\/a>, Julian Assange \u201cwas by far the most frequently discussed individual on Twitter\u201d with regards to the Media Freedom Coalition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\u201cNumerous tweets highlighted the apparent irony that the UK was establishing and leading an international initiative on media freedom, while simultaneously undermining free media\u2026in their handling of Assange\u201d, the researchers found<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The hosting of a media freedom event within miles of Belmarsh prison in southeast London was seen as a public relations problem. Internal Foreign Office emails show UK officials monitored online behaviour accordingly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
After Hunt announced<\/a> plans for the conference in February 2019, one official complained about \u201ca few individual crazy responses to the FS\u2019 [Foreign Secretary\u2019s] tweet\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n By June, officials were requesting \u201cLines to Take on how best to respond to questions we expect to be raised on this occasion about the UK handling of the case of Julian Assange\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In particular, \u201cIcelandic criticism of UK handling of [the] Assange case\u201d was seen to be \u201caffecting messaging on media freedom\u201d. <\/p>\n\n\n\n This email was likely related to former Icelandic Interior Minister \u00d6gmundur <\/em>J\u00f3nasson, who had asserted<\/a> in June that the Assange case put \u201cthe British justice system\u2026on trial\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cOur current approach is right and we shouldn\u2019t engage”.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n On 8 July, two days before the conference began, an unnamed official wrote about \u201ca ramp up in activity by Assange campaigners\u201d. <\/p>\n\n\n\n One cause for concern was Assange\u2019s mother Christine, who had \u201cjoined calls for a tweetstorm during the conference\u201d, as well as \u201caccounts [which] are small scale or are run by active trolls and provocateurs\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The official outlined rules for engagement, noting \u201cour current approach is right and we shouldn\u2019t engage\u2026However, we should be ready. I\u2019m keen that we agree ahead of time how and when our approach would evolve\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In an email with the subject line \u201cMedia Freedom Conference \u2013 online register of interest form\u201d, one official even questioned: \u201cwhat if someone like Assange applied to attend?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Foreign Office emails discussing Assange remain heavily redacted for reasons of \u201cnational security\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n According to a recent academic study<\/a>, Julian Assange \u201cwas by far the most frequently discussed individual on Twitter\u201d with regards to the Media Freedom Coalition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cNumerous tweets highlighted the apparent irony that the UK was establishing and leading an international initiative on media freedom, while simultaneously undermining free media\u2026in their handling of Assange\u201d, the researchers found<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nRELATED<\/h3>\n
UK\u2019s former Brexit secretary says Assange judge \u2018got the law...<\/h2><\/a>\n READ MORE <\/i><\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u2018No communications strategy can make this go away\u2019<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n